by Joy Christian » Sat Mar 11, 2023 1:19 pm
JohnDuffield wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:39 am
Joy: i'd like to see you write a paper about Bell's straight-line inequality and Clauser and Freedman's cosine experimental results, also comparing the latter with Malus's law.
(1) In
this paper I compare Bell's local model producing straight lines (or the seesaw curve) with the cosine curve predicted by quantum mechanics and observed in the Bell-test experiments. In particular, I bring out why the difference between the two models arises. The difference has nothing to do with quantum entanglement
per se. It has to do with the spinorial sign changes induced by quaternions that constitute the geometry of the physical space.
(2) In
this paper I demonstrate, on formal grounds, that Bell's theorem is a fundamentally flawed argument. In particular, I show that while Bell inequalities can be derived mathematically, they have nothing to do with any kind of physics whatsoever, let alone with local hidden variable theories.
(3) On page 10 of
this paper (written in 2007) I derive Malus's law for sequential spin measurements within my Clifford-algebraic framework for explaining the strong quantum correlations local-realistically.
.
[quote=JohnDuffield post_id=922 time=1678556398 user_id=81]
Joy: i'd like to see you write a paper about Bell's straight-line inequality and Clauser and Freedman's cosine experimental results, also comparing the latter with Malus's law.
[/quote]
(1) In [url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.10288]this paper[/url] I compare Bell's local model producing straight lines (or the seesaw curve) with the cosine curve predicted by quantum mechanics and observed in the Bell-test experiments. In particular, I bring out why the difference between the two models arises. The difference has nothing to do with quantum entanglement [i]per se[/i]. It has to do with the spinorial sign changes induced by quaternions that constitute the geometry of the physical space.
(2) In [url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09519]this paper[/url] I demonstrate, on formal grounds, that Bell's theorem is a fundamentally flawed argument. In particular, I show that while Bell inequalities can be derived mathematically, they have nothing to do with any kind of physics whatsoever, let alone with local hidden variable theories.
(3) On page 10 of [url=https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1333]this paper[/url] (written in 2007) I derive Malus's law for sequential spin measurements within my Clifford-algebraic framework for explaining the strong quantum correlations local-realistically.
.
