by kev01 » Fri Oct 28, 2022 11:25 pm
I could and maybe should just do what most former contributors have obviously done and abandoned this site as a dead end not worth any further input.
One more prod though. Unless one is living under a rock, it's patently obvious by now that a host of QC projects have delivered results that *evidently* cannot be explained without recourse to invoking entanglement a la standard QM - 'spooky action at a distance' as AE put it.
For *many* years now there has been put forth a proposed experimental confirmation of the alternate view, championed here, that nature is local and realistic and deterministic. Why then has that experimental decider avenue not been pursued with something approximating to zeal?
I could and maybe should just do what most former contributors have obviously done and abandoned this site as a dead end not worth any further input.
One more prod though. Unless one is living under a rock, it's patently obvious by now that a host of QC projects have delivered results that *evidently* cannot be explained without recourse to invoking entanglement a la standard QM - 'spooky action at a distance' as AE put it.
For *many* years now there has been put forth a proposed experimental confirmation of the alternate view, championed here, that nature is local and realistic and deterministic. Why then has that experimental decider avenue not been pursued with something approximating to zeal?
