Sci.Physics.Foundations

Congratulations, Joy! https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/ ... sos.220147

Do not forget the paper "On a contextual model refuting Bell's theorem" https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1209/0295-5075/134/10004 It clearly states there is no spooky action at a distance needed to explain the EPR correlations Do not forget the paper by Dean Mamas and my refutation t...

Do not forget the paper "On a contextual model refuting Bell's theorem" https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1209/0295-5075/134/10004 It clearly states there is no spooky action at a distance needed to explain the EPR correlations Unfortunately what it clearly states is clearly wrong.

Here's my try at shooting down Kupczynski's theory (joint work with Justo Pastor Lambare from Paraguay). https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09930 We submitted the paper to Frontiers in Physics. So far three positive referee reports, and a call from the editor to submit a revision. Also, new statistical anal...

A number of authors have long been arguing that non-locality is an artefact of contextuality. I mention the names Nieuwenhuizen, Khrennikov, de Raedt, Hess, Kupczinski. Here is a new PubPeer discussion on one of Kupczynski's recent works. https://pubpeer.com/publications/8D413565946AE3D4A5BDDAA7112...

A number of authors have long been arguing that non-locality is an artefact of contextuality. I mention the names Nieuwenhuizen, Khrennikov, de Raedt, Hess, Kupczinski. Here is a new PubPeer discussion on one of Kupczynski's recent works. https://pubpeer.com/publications/8D413565946AE3D4A5BDDAA711238A

I did not choose X = 1 + epsilon and Y = 1 - epsilon to allege a counterexample. You and Lasenby made those ad hoc and incorrect choices, so don't throw them back at me. Such two-dimensional objects play no role whatsoever in my local-realistic framework. They are entirely your mistakes, not mine. ...

Joy, you define ||.|| to be a non-negative real number. Yet you give an example with ||X|| = sqrt(1 + epsilon) and ||Y|| = sqrt(1 - epsilon), where epsilon is not a real number. I did not choose X = 1 + epsilon and Y = 1 - epsilon to allege a counterexample. You and Lasenby made those ad hoc and in...

That is not correct. In eq. (11) mu_1 and mu_2 are defined to be fixed for each run. They are defined in terms of the initial spin direction s^i at the source. It is important to read what I have defined carefully. OK, but in that case the notation and/or explanation needs some improvement. You are...

Joy, you define ||.|| to be a non-negative real number. Yet you give an example with ||X|| = sqrt(1 + epsilon) and ||Y|| = sqrt(1 - epsilon), where epsilon is not a real number.

Joy, you define your measurement outcomes in (13) and (19). This involves limits: limits as s _1 converges to mu_1 a , and as s _2 converges to mu_2 b . But mu_1 and mu_2 are not fixed, in fact they are defined in terms of s _1 and s _2, see (11): mu_1 = sign( a . s _1) and mu_2 = sign( s _2 . b ) ...

Joy, you define your measurement outcomes in (13) and (19). This involves limits: limits as s _1 converges to mu_1 a , and as s _2 converges to mu_2 b . But mu_1 and mu_2 are not fixed, in fact they are defined in terms of s _1 and s _2, see (11): mu_1 = sign( a . s _1) and mu_2 = sign( s _2 . b )

Well done!

["Never give up, never surrender" - Galaxy Quest]

... Interesting. What do Mathematica and MathCad have to say about "lim_{x to 0} sin(x) / x"? https://sciphysicsfoundations.com/sims/mathcadlimit2.png https://sciphysicsfoundations.com/sims/mathcadlimit3.png That is just the cursor bar at the end of that last x. . OK. Now substitute a = 0...

OK! Well, you’ve had my comments before. Mathematica’s algorithm for computing a limit is the wrong algorithm for this application. It uses the discrete topology instead of the usual topology on R^3, because it is based primarily on doing formal formula manipulations, not on doing numerical computa...

I hope the acceptance (or not) of its demise will depend on the outcome of the experiment? If the experiment could, in principle, go either way, then we are talking about physics. But if it can only go one way we are talking about mathematics. Indeed. The mathematics of the quaternionic 3-sphere al...

Very nice! I like the painting. Watch your eyes though. You repeatedly look to one corner and your expression changes, this is distracting. Practice makes perfect! Thanks, that painting belonged to my mom and dad and was in the entry area of the house where I grew up. The "one corner" was...

. This month brings the fifteenth anniversary of my disproof of Bell's theorem and the tenth anniversary of the first edition of my book on the subject. To celebrate the dual anniversary, I have slightly updated my proposed experiment to test the quaternionic 3-sphere model on which my disproof of ...

Very nice! I like the painting. Watch your eyes though. You repeatedly look to one corner and your expression changes, this is distracting. Practice makes perfect!