Sci.Physics.Foundations

Looks like you really think being impolite is a sign of strength? Being impolite is a sign of weakness. Those who have strong arguments have no necessity to cry around and claim victories. They know that theorems cannot be killed and therefore they don't care much about claimed theorem-killers. Have...

Just to explain the argumentation behind it. Alice can measure in any direct a, and the result A predicts what Bob measures if he chooses direction a too, namely he will measure -A. Now we apply the EPR criterion of reality: "If, without in any way disturbing a system, we can predict with certa...

So why would such "hidden faster than light information channel" operate only at certain setting angles, and for a particular combination of "cyclicly dependent" setting pairs? But the main point is that nothing can violate a mathematical inequality. Any apparent violation point...

... I have written my answer into a separate thread, because I think the question how a preferred frame allows to violate the BI too much differs from the question if there are objections against a preferred frame. See here for this discussion. The solution of a "hidden" preferred frame i...

FrediFizzx seem to have a problem which I don't understand. My claim is that if there exists some hidden faster than light information channel between the particle flying to Alice and the particle flying to Bob than the Bell inequalities can be easily violated. How does this work in QT? The particle...

There are several ways to solve the problem created by the violation of the Bell inequalities. ... Hmm... there is no problem there because the Bell inequalities are never ever "violated". Indeed, those who prefer one of the first two solutions can say there is no problem at all. Moreover...

There are several ways to solve the problem created by the violation of the Bell inequalities. The first one, quite popular here but rejected as nonsense by the mainstream, is to question Bell's theorem itself. The second one is to find various loopholes in the experiments which show violations of t...

I would have liked that 6 trillion package too - because with that US goes downhill much faster. 1.75 trillion are also not that bad, but 6 trillion would have been much more serious harm to the US. After Trump I thought that now the Bernie freaks have the power and all will go down very fast, given...