Sci.Physics.Foundations

Models based on the fact that the partners of an entangled pair share the same value of a statistical parameter cannot explain teleportation and entanglement swapping because the partner particles of the resulting entangled states after a teleportation or an entanglement swapping never had contact b...

In theories that try to explain the correlations of entangled photons with local models, it is commonly assumed that the particles of a photon pair are connected by common hidden parameters generated at the source. Is this assumption tenable? Phenomena such as entanglement swapping or teleportation ...

Bell's theorem is based on the assumption that any possible realistic model must represent the measurement results of a polarization measurement on entangled photons in the form A(a, l) and B(b, l), where a and b are the settings of the polarizers and l is a hidden statistical parameter in any form....

Do not forget the paper
"On a contextual model refuting Bell's theorem"

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1 ... /134/10004

It clearly states there is no spooky action at a distance needed to explain the EPR correlations

Well, if you are right, you will have no difficulty at all in getting someone to program your model on a simulated computer network, and then you will be in line for a big prize from me, and indeed for worldwide recognition and a Nobel prize. Richard, it becomes apparent that you are not a physicis...

I agree, this is local . However, what is not local in your published model is that to calculate the result in one laboratory you need the setting of the other laboratory. You call this contextuality but it doesn't matter how you call it, it is nonlocal for everybody except for you. So, you are red...

How does selection of photons by Alice’s device cause photons arriving at Bob’s device to be selected in a way which depends on Alice’s device setting (which she chose while the photons were “en route”)? In present day Bell type experiments the experimental unit is “time slot”, and in each time slo...

gill1109 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 28, 2021 9:43 pm
You say your new assumption is local realistic. However, it is only realistic, not local.

What you write is unfounded. The new assumption MA2new refers only to one side. So it is local per definition.

Richard, you always ride the same wave with your reference to programming. If you have anything to criticize, criticize the written text. The reference to Bell's theorem is not a proof, because that is precisely the subject of the analysis. Why is the following passage not local?: MA2new has the con...

Bell has assumed that hidden variables in a model must be coupled if this is to reproduce the measurement results on entangled photon pairs. It is shown that various phenomena, including entanglement swapping, cannot be explained with this assumption. A model is therefore presented that manages with...