Sci.Physics.Foundations

gill1109 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:17 am
I hope I'll be invited to referee it.

What good would that do? You would only make your usual ignoramus third-rate comments without any knowledge or understanding of elementary physics.
.

. Richard D. Gill has published another crank "Comment" paper on my work on quantum correlations: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201909. His paper is full of mathematical, conceptual, physical, and logical mistakes, as all of his papers and his silly "challenges" on the subject are...

. Gill does not want to understand anything. If he wanted to, then he would have done so 15 years ago. All of his excuses for not accepting the truth are now destroyed. What you have explained above, Fred, destroys his last quibble about the orientation lambda, which is no longer used in the above s...

Amazing what a mere statistician can achieve: Dear Richard D. Gill, We’d like to inform you that Research.com, a leading academic platform for researchers, has just released the 2022 Edition of our Ranking of Top 1000 Scientists in the field of Mathematics. We are sure you will be very happy to lea...

My “Comment” on Joy’s RSOS paper is now published. Looking forward to the publishing of the necessary “Reply”. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201909 Finally! I have already submitted my Reply paper to RSOS : http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34887.37286. Abstract : In this pape...

. Richard D. Gill has published another crank "comment" paper on my work on quantum correlations, which he mistakenly thinks is on Bell's "theorem": https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9622238. As tedious a waste of time it is for me to keep replying to Gill's crank papers, I h...

. One of the often-cited support for Bell's discredited theorem is the fashion of quantum computers and the so-called "quantum advantage", or supremacy. Well, the game is over for quantum computers, at least for now: https://physics.aps.org/articles/v15/19. In the old forum, we had a lot o...

gill1109 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:41 pm
By the way, my RSOS paper is now accepted and in production.

Yeah, right. I will believe it when I see it on the RSOS website. The paper was submitted 16 months ago, in October 2020, but it is still "in production."
.

There is nothing obscure about realism as it is used in physics. See my example above! Not sure why you think it is obscure. In part you are right. The problem is that everyone has his own definition of realism and some of them are obscure metaphysical ideas. Besides, I don't recall Bell messing wi...

Brilliant Fred. You just proved that the scaler part of the product of two quaternions is equal to the cosine of the angle between them. I apologize for saying that you had an incorrect calculation. You should publish a paper on that result. Apology NOT accepted! And..., you should try to understan...

To Richard Gill and Joy Christian: WRT your debate, please define REALISM. There is no "debate". Richard D. Gill cannot do math and he does not have any knowledge or background in physics. So he resorts to ad hominem and ad verecundiam attacks on me personally and concocts a grotesque str...

Gill wrote on his blog for his latest challenge, “Alice’s nth output x may depend only on Alice’s nth input a, together with (if desired) all [ie, both Alice’s and Bob’s] preceding inputs and outputs. Similarly, Bob’s nth output y may depend only on Bob’s input b, together with (if desired) all pre...

. Richard D. Gill has published another crank "comment" paper on my work on quantum correlations, which he mistakenly thinks is on Bell's "theorem": https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9622238. As tedious a waste of time it is for me to keep replying to Gill's crank papers, I h...

.
The article says: "The Bell ruling means that a particle can’t carry with it, locally, a “hidden variable” that determines measurement outcomes."

For how long is the physics community going to believe this complete falsehood? Why do so many otherwise smart people believe such nonsense?
.

. Richard D. Gill has published another crank "comment" paper on my work on quantum correlations, which he mistakenly thinks is on Bell's "theorem": https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9622238. As tedious a waste of time it is for me to keep replying to Gill's crank papers, I h...

Thanks again, Fred. I only plan to reference the simulation, not include it. So if you can make a separate thread for it and lock it, then that would be ideal. Well, it will be a separate section like "Updated EPR Paper". What do you want to name it? I have given the following name to the...

. Thanks, Fred. That reminds me: Let me know a definitive version of this simulation. I would like to reference it in my upcoming paper. I am taking a long time to write the paper because I want it to be perfect. Perhaps a neutral site like the Wolfram-cloud site may be more appropriate as a refere...

. Thanks, Fred. That reminds me: Let me know a definitive version of this simulation. I would like to reference it in my upcoming paper. I am taking a long time to write the paper because I want it to be perfect. Perhaps a neutral site like the Wolfram-cloud site may be more appropriate as a referen...

My "Reply to Comment" paper has been accepted by IEEE Access . Its publication will follow after my submission of the final manuscript files. . Great! RSOS seems to be being delayed by hangovers after a boozy Christmas and New Year. I hope it is concluded soon. They told me before Christm...

. Richard D. Gill has published another crank "comment" paper on my work on quantum correlations, which he mistakenly thinks is on Bell's "theorem": https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9622238. As tedious a waste of time it is for me to keep replying to Gill's crank papers, I h...