Sci.Physics.Foundations

You don't listen to our arguments against your "simulation". It's using the detection loophole. That should be easy to understand. Let me help you understand it: lambda1 & lambda2 = 0 -> no samples are discarded -> triangle curve and CHSH <2 lambda1 & lambda2 not = 0 -> samples are...

After the statistical analysis of events loop, add the following statement in both your normal calculation and lambda = 0 calculation: Total[nPP + nPN + nNP + nNN] this will show how many samples were used in each calculation. In the example with lambdas not equal zero, you''ll see about 50% samples...

If you add the Total statement in that run of the program, you would find all samples are used. What do you conclude from that?

If you want to see the effects of data rejection, remove or comment lambda1 and lambda2 in the first do-loop. Then replace these with: lambda1[[i]]=lambda2[[i]]=0. This will do away with data rejection. You will now get all events in the calculation. The output plot will be a perfect triangle. No s...

If you want to see the effects of data rejection, remove or comment lambda1 and lambda2 in the first do-loop. Then replace these with: lambda1[[i]]=lambda2[[i]]=0. This will do away with data rejection. You will now get all events in the calculation. The output plot will be a perfect triangle. No sa...

The detection loophole is still alive and well. Nope! Total Events = 4993634. So, we are only missing just a few events out of 5 million trials. Not enough for any detection loophole. Let's discuss how your program works. You set up an array of random angles on a unit sphere (s), then two random va...

I have looked at your latest version, and here are my comments: You did a great job of getting things to fit the cosine curve. The fitting worked really well. There are now two detectors for each observer. They generate two records for each experiment for each observer. The detection loophole is st...

@gill1109 LOL! Is this off-topic? Well maybe it's not since you are the only non-coward Bell Fanatic. New paper is coming soon. It is so awesome I can hardly contain myself. :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: I’m looking forward to it! Yes, I am too. Don't forget I'm another Bell Fanatic, that makes two...

I have looked at your latest version, and here are my comments: You did a great job of getting things to fit the cosine curve. The fitting worked really well. There are now two detectors for each observer. They generate two records for each experiment for each observer. The detection loophole is sti...

Fred, can you post the notebook file for these plots? I'd like to see what you are doing.