Sci.Physics.Foundations

OK! Well, you’ve had my comments before. Mathematica’s algorithm for computing a limit is the wrong algorithm for this application. It uses the discrete topology instead of the usual topology on R^3, because it is based primarily on doing formal formula manipulations, not on doing numerical computat...

Congratulations, Fred! I hope you will keep us posted on publication or pre-publication progress.

Taking limits as the dummy variable s1 converges to the limit sign(a.s1)a while s2 converges to the limit sign(b.s2)b and moreover s1 = -s2 is non-sense. Or more accurately, it is not a legal operation in calculus. It's not defined in mathematics. It is meaningless. Anyway, whether it is a local sol...

I hope I'll be invited to referee it.

Yeah, Mathematica has the cosine and knows how to multiply quaternions.

FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 12:39 am

gill1109 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 12:10 am So when’s the paper coming out?

Last week.

Ah, it would have been all over social media, but first, there was that storm, and after that everyone was watching Putin. That's sad.

So when’s the paper coming out?

Amazing what a mere statistician can achieve: Dear Richard D. Gill, We’d like to inform you that Research.com, a leading academic platform for researchers, has just released the 2022 Edition of our Ranking of Top 1000 Scientists in the field of Mathematics. We are sure you will be very happy to lear...

My “Comment” on Joy’s RSOS paper is now published. Looking forward to the publishing of the necessary “Reply”. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/ ... sos.201909

I have two questions:

1) What does the argument “(2)” mean in equations D32 and D40?

2) I see that A defined in D25 depends on lambda_2, and lambda_2 depends on q_b, which depends on b. (And similarly for B …). How would this be realised physically without action at a distance?

To Richard Gill and Joy Christian: WRT your debate, please define REALISM. There is no "debate". Richard D. Gill cannot do math ... <SNIP> As for "realism", it was defined by Einstein and Bell in the context of the Bohr-Einstein debate. Look it up. There is no debate regarding t...

Yep, it uses the detection loophole, and avoids a number of drawbacks of the Pearl model. https://rpubs.com/gill1109/Gisin2opt It doesn't work with random angles so it is not even a model. It's just more junk. . You mean you don’t understand it, and therefore you call it junk. It does work with ran...

Yep, it uses the detection loophole, and avoids a number of drawbacks of the Pearl model. https://rpubs.com/gill1109/Gisin2opt By the way, my RSOS paper is now accepted and in production. It was held up by one referee. He believes that Bell's theorem is both true and not true and that this is the ca...

@gill1109 More typical misdirection so deleted your post. Ask a question about something specific in the junk theories. You can explain the more broader questions you asked if you wish. I don't have time for this nonsense actually. Working on the GRF essay. That was not misdirection. You claim that...

Great! RSOS seems to be being delayed by hangovers after a boozy Christmas and New Year. I hope it is concluded soon. They told me before Christmas that just one referee had been delaying things, but they had had contact with him or her again, and this soon should be finished. Then we will be done ...

Meanwhile there are interesting discussions going on at https://gill1109.com/2022/01/02/the-big-bell-bet/ Just a bunch of egotists butting heads like rutting stags. Nobody cares. Ha, ha! Seems you care enough to make insulting ad hominem comments about the discussion there. Are you saying that Brya...

Yes, in Fred-World all is settled. ... Well, you had a chance to ask me a question about your math theory but didn't and still haven't. Do you even remember what your math theory is? :lol: Typical Bell fanatic misdirection by spewing nonsense on top of nonsense. . Fred, I think that your picture of...

Yes, in Fred-World all is settled.

Meanwhile there are interesting discussions going on at https://gill1109.com/2022/01/02/the-big-bell-bet/

. Richard D. Gill has published another crank "comment" paper on my work on quantum correlations, which he mistakenly thinks is on Bell's "theorem": https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9622238. As tedious a waste of time it is for me to keep replying to Gill's crank papers, I h...

OK, so your value of CHSH is 2.806 +/- 0.008 An approx 95% confidence interval is 2.806 +/- 2 x 0.008 2 sqrt 2, your target, is 2.828… The target is outside the approx 95% confidence interval. That’s not so good. Does this look like a face that cares? :mrgreen: It's good enough to destroy your junk...