Sci.Physics.Foundations

Don't care about it. You calculate it since you have Mathematica. :D Tell me the 10 separate results, and I’ll do it for you. That should be very easy for you. They are at the end of the notebook file or PDF file which I guess you haven't even looked at. :D . Yeah, I’m very lazy x <- c(2.7785450105...

And what is the standard deviation (s.d.) of the 10 results you’ve averaged? The standard error of your final average is s.d./sqrt(10) Don't care about it. You calculate it since you have Mathematica. :D . Tell me the 10 separate results, and I’ll do it for you. That should be very easy for you.

Great quote. I read Bonhoeffer as a teenager. His theology left quite an impression on me. Whether or not it is dangerous to argue with a stupid person depends on their power and that depends on whether or not they have supporters. Hence Bonhoeffer advised caution. When fighting a more powerful enem...

And what is the standard deviation (s.d.) of the 10 results you’ve averaged?

The standard error of your final average is s.d./sqrt(10)

Structure of QM from geometry of space: https://sciencex.com/news/2022-01-quantum-theorists-mechanics.html What a worthless waffle! Why do you post such junk in this forum? The correct geometrical origins of quantum mechanics are rooted in the Euclidean Primitives, as I demonstrated over three year...

Structure of QM from geometry of space: https://sciencex.com/news/2022-01-quantum-theorists-mechanics.html I'm not sure how you get that from that article. The structure of QM is simply the Born rule. QM is just a probabilistic math about physical events. Necessary because we don't actually know wh...

Structure of QM from geometry of space: https://sciencex.com/news/2022-01-quant ... anics.html

Here's what I got out of Lasenby's presentation: Straightforward geometric algebra, right hand frame vectors: e1, e2, e3, pseudoscaler I = e1 e2 e3 bivectors: B1 = I e1, B2 = I e2, B3 = I e3 For a left hand frame, reverse signs of e1, e2, e3: e1' =-e1, e2' = -e2, e3' = -e3, for the pseudoscaler we ...

... The use of lambda in the following equations in Joy's paper is incorrect. ... There is no lambda in the updated model. What the heck are you going to do now? You ought to just admit that Bell's junk physics theory belongs in the dustbin. :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: There is no updated model. ...

... It is also worth noting that in the updated version of this thread the orientation lambda plays no role so Lasenby's entire argument goes to the dustbin. Also in the dustbin is Gill's claim about your A and B functions always giving -1 for AB. With the full detector polarization, the A and B fu...

... Meanwhile, Bryan Sanctuary’s bet is live. https://gill1109.com/2022/01/02/the-big-bell-bet/ If you want to deal a devastating blow to all quantum mysterians, you will want to support Bryan Sanctuary. Where is his model? Last time I looked, his model didn't work. Besides, you are finished as a B...

Joy Christian and Anthony Lasenby’s AGACSE talks in Brno, 2021, are on YouTube. Links from here: http://agacse2021.fme.vutbr.cz/photos.php https://youtu.be/73NJHqJ-WxI Lasenby https://youtu.be/4h29G5yGzaI Christian They are separating the Lasenby-Christian debate from the main part of the conference...

Happy new year, Fred! Goodbye!

Here’s the link to Joy’s talk at AGACSE 2021
https://youtu.be/4h29G5yGzaI

Here’s Lasenby’s talk
https://youtu.be/73NJHqJ-WxI

Enjoy!

Complete hogwash. You always have stupid things to waffle about everything. I am not going to worry about what you delude yourself with. “Complete hogwash”. Now there’s a subtle argument. Hm… have to think about those wise words. Right, I have given your response some careful thought. Here is my re...

No, that is incorrect. a and b in the above refutation are experimental settings, such as angles specifying the orientations of the analyzers. . Alice and Bob choose their settings: “a” and “b” respectively. In an ideal EPR-B experiment, a particle always arrives at both Alice and Bob’s measurement...

Joy: you write about a, b and lambda and it seems you think of a and b as being outcomes, not inputs. No, that is incorrect. a and b in the above refutation are experimental settings, such as angles specifying the orientations of the analyzers. . Alice and Bob choose their settings: “a” and “b” res...

The systematic deviations from the negative cosine are plain to see! Fred, you have proven that the EPR-B correlations do not exist!

I love engaging nonsense. That’s why I come here to engage with Joy and Fred.

Yeah, good idea. The Bell fanatics like to engage in pure nonsense all the time! But that is a really good refutation. Happy New Year! Fred: superdeterminism is proposed by anti-Bellists like Tim Palmer and Sabine Hossenfelder. They do believe that Bell’s theorem as mathematics is a true theorem, b...

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!