Sci.Physics.Foundations

In the first line, QAB is the real part of the product of the A side with the B side. IOW, it is a scalar and is actually equal to the value of -a.b for the "i"th event. However, that product also leaves us with an imaginary part of the quaternion which we must get rid of like in the foll...

Article: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/7/2/32 "Quaternions are a natural framework of 4D space-time, where the unit element relates to time, and three others relate to 3D space." Not quite right! As I said in another thread, quaternions are representations of rotation or spin. I suspect ...

Looks like we finally shut down the Bell fanatics and all their nonsense. We Bell-believers are just bored with your nonsense. So you figured out some very complicated ways to draw a negative cosine with Mathematica. You could better spend your time revising your undergraduate-level probability and...

FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:53 pm Bell's junk physics theory will go down in history as one of the biggest hoaxes in physics history.

Sure. Like the round earth theory.

I hope everyone can plainly see what nonsense the Bell fanatic John Reed is doing here. He thinks that CHANGING THE CODE by setting beta and xi to zero mean something. As as far as the valid simulation goes, it means absolutely nothing because it is a strawman. But we have known for years, strawman...

Jarek Duda’s Krakow seminar: current link and list of talks are in the webpage: http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/QMFNoT also https://researchseminars.org/seminar/QMFNoT This Thursday 9 December at 17:00 CEST/Warsaw time we have talk: Speaker: Valeriy Sbitnev (Berkeley) Title: Quaternion algebra on 4D s...

Let's discuss how your program works. You set up an array of random angles on a unit sphere (s), then two random variables, lambda1 and lambda2, then go into a do loop for the samples generated by Alice and Bob. For Alice, a detector angle is found, and two comparisons are made with the quaternion ...

I have looked at your latest version, and here are my comments: You did a great job of getting things to fit the cosine curve. The fitting worked really well. There are now two detectors for each observer. They generate two records for each experiment for each observer. The detection loophole is st...

Well, if you are right, you will have no difficulty at all in getting someone to program your model on a simulated computer network, and then you will be in line for a big prize from me, and indeed for worldwide recognition and a Nobel prize. Richard, it becomes apparent that you are not a physicis...

"A vivid imagination and knack for artful lying". Who are you talking about, Joy? I am talking about you, Richard D. Gill. We know that, Joy. But the description fits you to a tee. Meanwhile, we will see your talk soon, I hope: Thank you very much for your valuable impact to this conferen...

I agree, this is local . However, what is not local in your published model is that to calculate the result in one laboratory you need the setting of the other laboratory. You call this contextuality but it doesn't matter how you call it, it is nonlocal for everybody except for you. So, you are red...

You have a vivid imagination and knack for artful lying. .... You are going down in history as a pathetic loser in any case. "A vivid imagination and knack for artful lying". Who are you talking about, Joy? :lol: :lol: :lol: I'm very glad that Joy Christian will get his contribution publi...

Derek was co-organiser of a session at the conference. But who cares? People were interested to hear you. They were excited to see a confrontation between you and Lasenby. They were astounded at what they heard. They were delighted that their man, Lasenby, carried the day. I doubt they’ll invite you...

Indeed, people are fascinated by your work. People feel a deep need for Bell to have been wrong. People want Geometric Algebra to cause the breakthrough. My obsessive-compulsive attention did not stop you getting those works published. On the contrary, it kept attention to your work alive. (It kept ...

You say your new assumption is local realistic. However, it is only realistic, not local. What you write is unfounded. The new assumption MA2new refers only to one side. So it is local per definition. Per your definition. Not per my definition. You say that I bring in computer programming games and...

Indeed, Joy convinced Fred! And that's where the convincing seems to have stopped!

But OK, we will see who else you two are able to convince after your next work is published.

Bell has assumed that hidden variables in a model must be coupled if this is to reproduce the measurement results on entangled photon pairs. It is shown that various phenomena, including entanglement swapping, cannot be explained with this assumption. A model is therefore presented that manages wit...

Joy’s method delivers the cosine exactly. But I wouldn’t call it a theory. I think of it as science fantasy. Yep, Gill has had NO clue for 14 years that Bell's theory is junk physics so he lives in some kind of fantasyland all this time. I'm sorry, but it is time for you to get out of that fantasy ...

Joy’s method delivers the cosine exactly. But I wouldn’t call it a theory. I think of it as science fantasy.

FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 6:52 am @gill1109 LOL! Is this off-topic? Well maybe it's not since you are the only non-coward Bell Fanatic. New paper is coming soon. It is so awesome I can hardly contain myself.

I’m looking forward to it!