Page 2 of 2
Re: Bell's Theorem Begs the Question
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 1:01 pm
by Joy Christian
FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 12:06 pm
Joy Christian wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 9:50 am
FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 8:57 am
After eq. (13) you say "...where
k is an arbitrary unit vector...".
k is the spin vector of the particles so not exactly arbitrary. The direction of
k is arbitrary. You might want to make that more clear.
Thanks! Yes,
k is a unit spin vector with arbitrary direction and a unit magnitude.
Ok, you're welcome. Now, I don't quite understand eq. (15). What do sigma_1 and sigma_2 represent?
sigma_1 and sigma_2 represent spins at the two observation stations 1 and 2 at the two ends of the experiment.
The spins in quantum mechanics are not represented by ordinary vectors like
k but by Pauli matrices, such as sigma_1 and sigma_2.
.
Re: Bell's Theorem Begs the Question
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 7:28 am
by FrediFizzx
Joy Christian wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 1:01 pm
FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 12:06 pm
Joy Christian wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 9:50 am
Thanks! Yes,
k is a unit spin vector with arbitrary direction and a unit magnitude.
Ok, you're welcome. Now, I don't quite understand eq. (15). What do sigma_1 and sigma_2 represent?
sigma_1 and sigma_2 represent spins at the two observation stations 1 and 2 at the two ends of the experiment.
The spins in quantum mechanics are not represented by ordinary vectors like
k but by Pauli matrices, such as sigma_1 and sigma_2.
Why bother with the 1 and 2 designations? They are exactly the same and eq. (15) is a matrix.
.
Re: Bell's Theorem Begs the Question
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 7:49 am
by Joy Christian
FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 7:28 am
Joy Christian wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 1:01 pm
FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 12:06 pm
Ok, you're welcome. Now, I don't quite understand eq. (15). What do sigma_1 and sigma_2 represent?
sigma_1 and sigma_2 represent spins at the two observation stations 1 and 2 at the two ends of the experiment.
The spins in quantum mechanics are not represented by ordinary vectors like
k but by Pauli matrices, such as sigma_1 and sigma_2.
Why bother with the 1 and 2 designations? They are exactly the same and eq. (15) is a matrix.
Because, while mathematically the same, they belong to two different spins, or particles, arriving at the spacelike separated observation stations 1 and 2.
.
Re: Bell's Theorem Begs the Question
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:34 pm
by FrediFizzx
Joy Christian wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 7:49 am
FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 7:28 am
Joy Christian wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 1:01 pm
sigma_1 and sigma_2 represent spins at the two observation stations 1 and 2 at the two ends of the experiment.
The spins in quantum mechanics are not represented by ordinary vectors like
k but by Pauli matrices, such as sigma_1 and sigma_2.
Why bother with the 1 and 2 designations? They are exactly the same and eq. (15) is a matrix.
Because, while mathematically the same, they belong to two different spins, or particles, arriving at the spacelike separated observation stations 1 and 2.
Sure, that is obvious so really no need for the sub 1 and 2. So, we have a Pauli vector interacting with a direction vector. Seems screwy as we don't get a cross product (
a x sigma).
Why is lambda all of a sudden appearing in eq. (16)?
.
Re: Bell's Theorem Begs the Question
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:46 pm
by Joy Christian
FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:34 pm
Joy Christian wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 7:49 am
FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 7:28 am
Why bother with the 1 and 2 designations? They are exactly the same and eq. (15) is a matrix.
Because, while mathematically the same, they belong to two different spins, or particles, arriving at the spacelike separated observation stations 1 and 2.
Sure, that is obvious so really no need for the sub 1 and 2. So, we have a Pauli vector interacting with a direction vector. Seems screwy as we don't get a cross product (
a x sigma).
Why is lambda all of a sudden appearing in eq. (16)?
The eigenvalues omega are determined by lambda in Bell's proof. The discussion in Section III is a continuation of the discussion in Section II.
.