EPR

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: EPR

Re: EPR

by FrediFizzx » Mon Feb 07, 2022 6:22 am

FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:51 am "Can the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?"

The easy answer is no. QM can't successfully predict event by event A and B outcomes in an EPR-Bohm scenario. Plus..., its prediction of -a.b for the correlation is not correct either. You can't have a continuous analog curve in Nature when your outcomes are digital.
OK, I take that last one back. It is not necessarily predicting a continuous curve. So, there is no reason that a simulation has to obtain a continuous curve. Which of course it can't.
.

EPR

by FrediFizzx » Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:51 am

"Can the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?"

The easy answer is no. QM can't successfully predict event by event A and B outcomes in an EPR-Bohm scenario. Plus..., its prediction of -a.b for the correlation is not correct either. You can't have a continuous analog curve in Nature when your outcomes are digital.
.

Top