"Can the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?"
The easy answer is no. QM can't successfully predict event by event A and B outcomes in an EPR-Bohm scenario. Plus..., its prediction of -a.b for the correlation is not correct either. You can't have a continuous analog curve in Nature when your outcomes are digital.
.
EPR
-
FrediFizzx
- Independent Physics Researcher
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 1:44 pm
- Location: N. California, USA
- Contact:
-
FrediFizzx
- Independent Physics Researcher
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 1:44 pm
- Location: N. California, USA
- Contact:
Re: EPR
OK, I take that last one back. It is not necessarily predicting a continuous curve. So, there is no reason that a simulation has to obtain a continuous curve. Which of course it can't.FrediFizzx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:51 am "Can the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?"
The easy answer is no. QM can't successfully predict event by event A and B outcomes in an EPR-Bohm scenario. Plus..., its prediction of -a.b for the correlation is not correct either. You can't have a continuous analog curve in Nature when your outcomes are digital.
.
